Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Boris Giltburg. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Boris Giltburg. Mostrar todas las entradas

miércoles, 16 de enero de 2019

Boris Giltburg LISZT Études d'exécution transcendante - La leggierezza - Rigoletto Paraphrase

Franz Liszt was one of the very first musical superstars, standing out from the ranks of 19th-century piano virtuosos. He is also the only one of them whose compositions continue to be widely performed to this day. Liszt’s ambitions were most likely triggered in 1832, when after hearing Niccolò Paganini at a concert, the 21-year-old determined to become as great a virtuoso on the piano as Paganini was on the violin. In this he succeeded brilliantly: his career as a touring pianist lasted only eight years (1839–47), but during that time his tours blazed all over Europe, leaving in their wake admiring, unbelieving audiences, swooning ladies, and broken pianos and hearts. 
Liszt’s Études d’exécution transcendante enshrine the spirit of High Romanticism, embodying extremes of expressive drama and technical virtuosity. His encyclopedic approach to technique is shown at its most dazzling in this cycle, heard here in the 1852 revision which Liszt himself declared ‘the only authentic one’. Integration of musical and technical elements is absolute, and the music’s narratives are supported by dramatic physicality, an orchestral richness of sonority, and an exceptional colouristic quality.

martes, 12 de julio de 2016

Boris Giltburg ROMANTIC SONATAS

Two earlier discs by Boris Giltburg got slightly lukewarm reviews in Fanfare . Reviewing a recital back in 2006, Colin Clarke concluded that, despite the pianist’s “tonal resources,” Mussorgsky’s Pictures just didn’t “all add up,” while his Prokofiev Eighth, intelligent as it was, needed to be more diabolic in the finale (30:2). Reviewing a more recent disc of Prokofiev’s three so-called “War Sonatas” (including a reprise of the Eighth), Raymond Beegle was even more neutral: “Boris Giltburg has many of the qualities of his predecessors, but gives us no particular virtue that stands above them” (36:4). This new disc offers repertoire of similar grandeur—but I hear playing of a distinctly higher order.  
Giltburg is, without a doubt, a hard-hitting pianist with an old-fashioned, heart-on-the-sleeve Romantic temperament. Although he’s capable of caressing the instrument (he miraculously captures the distilled beauty of the chordal section that begins seven bars from the end of the second movement of the Grieg), you’re more likely to be struck by his bass-centered tone and his huge sonority (try, for instance, the weighty left-hand octaves toward the end of the Grieg’s first movement or the first appearance of the Grandioso theme of the Liszt) and by his emphatic persona (he’s certainly not a pianist to tear through Liszt’s fugue). And while he’s capable of reflective simplicity (he’s especially sensitive to Rachmaninoff’s aching regret), you’re more likely to be struck by the moments of extreme passion. His tempos tend to be on the slow side of the spectrum, and he’s always ready to knead them in a way that increases our sense of anticipation. As a result, the climaxes always explode with a tremendous sense of arrival. Textures can be slightly thick (certainly, he seems to have little sympathy for the neoclassical side of Rachmaninoff’s aesthetic), but his tonal bear-hug is sufficiently compelling that, as you’re listening, you’re unlikely to complain.  
To some, I suppose, his approach might seem too high-pressure or overwrought—especially if you listen to all three of these sonatas in a single sitting. Still, Giltburg is a player with a strong and compelling personality; and while none of these performances trumps the very considerable competition (although it’s pretty near the top in the Grieg), pianophiles who decide to supplement their favorites with these new recordings will find themselves well rewarded. The sound is good, and the pianist provides exceptionally lucid and informative notes, which include a compelling case for the revised version of the Rachmaninoff.  (FANFARE / Peter J. Rabinowitz)