Marc-André Hamelin’s normally genial features cloud at the
description of him as a ‘super virtuoso’. For him such apparent praise
implies limitation rather than virtue. But here, in his latest disc of
music by Janáček and Schumann, he shows himself a virtuoso in a deeper
sense, a virtuoso in sound, colour and poetic empathy, one who, to quote
Liszt, ‘breathes the breath of life’. Using his prodigious command in
music of a transcendental difficulty—the Chopin-Godowsky Études, the
major works of Alkan, Albéniz’s Iberia, etc—he displays gifts
which show him as first and foremost a musician’s musician. In music of
an elusive rather than flamboyant challenge he is a master of
simplicity, of music which, in Goethe’s words, proves that it is when
working within limits that man creates his greatest work. The fewer the
notes, the more subtle and exposed the task. Certainly you could never
align Hamelin with, say, Horowitz’s teasing, lavishly tinted
sophistication or Cziffra’s hysterical bravura. He is a virtuoso in
another sense.
Linking Janáček and Schumann is both a natural and
an enterprising choice. The seeds of Schumann’s final collapse are
already present in Waldszenen's ‘Verrufene Stelle’ (‘Place of
evil fame’, where flowers are nourished by human blood rather than the
sun’s rays) or in ‘Fürchtenmachen’ (‘Frightening’) from Kinderszenen. Such things lead to a more oblique sense of desolation in Janáček's On the overgrown path,
the very title evocative of the past, of a time long eclipsed by bitter
adult experience; reflections of despair rather than tranquillity.
Janáček's failed marriage, his unrequited passion for a younger woman
and the death of his daughter Olga at the age of 20 are all mirrored in
music of the darkest introspection. Of On the overgrown path,
Janáček wrote ‘they are of all things most dear to me’, as if he cradled
his own unhappiness. How else can you explain titles such as
‘Unutterable Anguish’ and ‘In Tears’? Such tortured music was
predictably greeted with incomprehension; and, like Liszt before him
(the titles of his later dark-hued utterances, Nuages gris, Unstern or La lugubre gondola
tell their own tale) or Fauré after him, his profoundest creations were
ignored, causing him serious doubts. Thus, he wrote, ‘I no longer saw
any worth in my work and scarcely believed what I said. I had become
convinced that no one would notice anything.’ Admirably described (by
the Janáček scholar John Tyrrell) as ‘some of the profoundest, most
disturbing music that Janáček had written, their interest is quite out
of proportion to their modest means and ambition’. Again, these are
pieces ‘which begin disarmingly but are emotionally derailed within the
briefest of spans’.
Hamelin’s subtle inflection captures all of
the opening ‘Our evenings’, his nuance and musical breathing somehow
beyond such an academic term as rubato, the sudden disruptions like
flashes of anger flawlessly contrasted. Time and again he makes you
think vocally, of the range and flexibility of a great singer. Hear him
drop from mezzo-forte to pianissimo despondency in ‘A blown-away leaf', a
retreat as it were from Dylan Thomas’s Do not go gentle into that good night.
He is no less sensitive to the polka of ‘Come with us!’, a brief memory
of Moravian folk dance and happier times. Again, it would be difficult
to imagine a more lucid yet evocative sense of ‘The Frýdek Madonna’,
with its grave chorale offset by mystical shimmering. Hamelin makes the
limping steps of ‘Unutterable anguish’ like a prophecy of Debussy’s
painful progression in ‘Des pas sur la neige' (Préludes, Book 1), while
in the octaves of ‘In tears’ lies an uncomfortable awareness of the
contradiction behind an outwardly conciliatory conclusion.
Turning
to Schumann, Hamelin is no less illuminating than in his previous
recordings of music where poetry and introspection are combined (Fantasie, Carnaval, Études symphoniques, etc). In Waldszenen and Kinderszenen,
inwardness and an interior magic are only occasionally contradicted
with extroversion; there more of Eusebius (the man of dreams) than of
Florestan (the man of action) and so, once more, the emphasis for the
pianist is on a primarily interior world. How often have you heard the
entrance (‘Eintritt’) to Waldszenen played with such poised
rhythmic life or listened to the quizzical song of the ‘Vogel als
Prophet’ (‘Prophet bird’) with such a great awareness of its oddity?
Here, once more, the knife-edge between composer and interpreter,
between creator and recreator is held in the finest balance. And you
could hardly wish for a greater sense of wonder in Kinderszenen's
opening ‘Von fremden Ländern und Menschen’ (‘Of foreign lands and
peoples’) or a more unfaltering poise in the concluding ‘Der Dichter
spricht’ (‘The poet speaks’).
Writing to his beloved Clara regarding Kinderszenen,
Schumann told her, ‘you will have to forget you are a virtuoso’. On the
contrary, and returning to my opening proposition, Hamelin shows that
he is a virtuoso in another and richly inclusive sense. (Gramophone)
Nice, although it's too much piano to listen to in a row.
ResponderEliminar