First a threshold question: Is there any point in listening to the
Rite of Spring in its arrangement for two pianos in the first place? The
answer is 'yes,' even though this necessarily monochrome version
(compared to the orchestral original) can’t possibly capture the impact
that Stravinsky achieves simply through piling on the timbre of the full
orchestra. What it does reveal, though, is a harmonic clarity and a
focus on melody that makes certain sections, especially the climaxes,
sound very different than they ordinarily do—more linear, more lyrical,
less strenuous.
Consider the 'Spring Rounds' section in the
work’s first part. The orchestral version, with its crashing tam-tam and
terrifying brass smears, hits you in the gut. As heard on two pianos,
we can follow how Stravinsky fragments and distributes the melody in
different registers, and maintains the long, lyrical line all the way
through the section. It’s really a different experience entirely,
equally legitimate in its way, and certainly an illuminating commentary
on the composer’s technique. All of which brings us to this particular
performance.
There’s no question that Marc-André Hamelin and Leif Ove Andsnes, aside from having tripartite names in common, represent a
sort of pianistic 'dream team' when it comes to music of this difficulty
and complexity. Simply put, they turn in a version of The Rite not just
technically astounding, but paced and interpreted as well as any of the
best full-orchestra performances. There’s not a moment when you think
to yourself, 'This should be faster, or slower, or lighter, or
weightier.' It’s a fully realized, perfectly executed vision of the
work, nowhere more so than in the latter half of the second part, where
so many other performances bog down in the music’s minimalist rhythmic
repetitiousness. And my God, how they tear into the concluding
Sacrificial Dance!
And let’s not forget the other major work
here. Stravinsky’s Concerto for Two Pianos is one of his most perfectly
crafted neoclassical masterpieces. It attracts little attention these
days, but here’s a performance whose crispness, elegance, and clarity
(in the final fugue especially) ought to win it many new friends. The
piece has received plenty of fine outings on disc previously, from the
Kontarsky brothers on DG in particular, but this interpretation is
special because it manages to be precise, that is 'Stravinskian',
without ever sounding merely mechanical. The virtuosity of the players
never draws attention to itself; rather, it gives the music an easy flow
that projects a true sense of joy in the act of bringing the work to
life.
The shorter pieces are nice to have, but almost beside the
point next to the main items. If you take your Stravinsky at all
seriously, you will need to hear this. (Classics Today)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario