Stravinsky’s relationship with the string section of the orchestra, and 
with the violin in particular, was a love-hate affair. For a long time 
during and after the First World War he more or less gave up writing for
 strings altogether, finding their tone ‘much too evocative’, as he put 
it after completing The Rite of Spring, ‘and representative of the human voice’. Then suddenly, in 1928, he came out with a ballet score, Apollo,
 written exclusively for strings and uninhibitedly tender and expressive
 in precisely the way he had previously so pointedly rejected. Apollo
 seems to have ‘corrected’ his attitude in general, and within four 
years he had composed two major works for violin solo, the concerto with
 orchestra of 1931 and the Duo concertant with piano of 1932. Soon after that he made most of the transcriptions recorded here.
 Why Apollo turned out as it did is one of the great 
Stravinskian mysteries. But the violin works that followed had a clear 
and specific origin. Towards the end of 1930, Stravinsky’s German 
publisher, Willy Strecker, introduced him to a young Polish-American 
violinist by the name of Samuel Dushkin and invited him to write a 
concerto for Dushkin to play and Strecker’s firm, Schott, to publish. 
Dushkin was a fine, if not great, violinist; but above all he was an 
intelligent and cultivated musician who it transpired could give 
Stravinsky—not a string-player—sympathetic advice on technical matters. 
After the premiere of the Violin Concerto, in Berlin in October 1931, 
Stravinsky began work on a recital piece for violin and piano which he 
and Dushkin would be able to programme without all the expense and 
paraphernalia of orchestral concert bookings. There were undoubtedly 
complicated motives behind the Duo concertant, as the new work 
would be called. Dushkin had an exclusivity on the concerto for a 
certain period, but after that there was no way of forcing agents to 
prefer him to other, more famous virtuosos, with whom, on the other 
hand, Stravinsky (who was desperate for concert engagements) might not 
want to work. A recital, by contrast, could be offered as a package. 
Their first appearance in this form was in Milan in March 1932. But it 
was at once apparent that joint repertoire would be a problem. They 
played the concerto (with piano), and a suite Stravinsky had made from 
the ballet Pulcinella in 1925. But otherwise they played solos. Stravinsky had no interest in performing the standard duo repertoire. His own Duo
 was not yet ready and even if it had been they would have had barely 
fifty minutes’ music. How to remedy this crucial problem at a time when 
concert bookings were falling, politics and economics were starting to 
close in on orchestral planning, and Stravinsky needed to make the most 
of his personal notoriety and the relative popularity of his best-known 
works?
Why Apollo turned out as it did is one of the great 
Stravinskian mysteries. But the violin works that followed had a clear 
and specific origin. Towards the end of 1930, Stravinsky’s German 
publisher, Willy Strecker, introduced him to a young Polish-American 
violinist by the name of Samuel Dushkin and invited him to write a 
concerto for Dushkin to play and Strecker’s firm, Schott, to publish. 
Dushkin was a fine, if not great, violinist; but above all he was an 
intelligent and cultivated musician who it transpired could give 
Stravinsky—not a string-player—sympathetic advice on technical matters. 
After the premiere of the Violin Concerto, in Berlin in October 1931, 
Stravinsky began work on a recital piece for violin and piano which he 
and Dushkin would be able to programme without all the expense and 
paraphernalia of orchestral concert bookings. There were undoubtedly 
complicated motives behind the Duo concertant, as the new work 
would be called. Dushkin had an exclusivity on the concerto for a 
certain period, but after that there was no way of forcing agents to 
prefer him to other, more famous virtuosos, with whom, on the other 
hand, Stravinsky (who was desperate for concert engagements) might not 
want to work. A recital, by contrast, could be offered as a package. 
Their first appearance in this form was in Milan in March 1932. But it 
was at once apparent that joint repertoire would be a problem. They 
played the concerto (with piano), and a suite Stravinsky had made from 
the ballet Pulcinella in 1925. But otherwise they played solos. Stravinsky had no interest in performing the standard duo repertoire. His own Duo
 was not yet ready and even if it had been they would have had barely 
fifty minutes’ music. How to remedy this crucial problem at a time when 
concert bookings were falling, politics and economics were starting to 
close in on orchestral planning, and Stravinsky needed to make the most 
of his personal notoriety and the relative popularity of his best-known 
works?
The answer he and Dushkin came up with is to be found on the present 
disc. Soon after the Milan concert Stravinsky wrote to Strecker that the
 two of them were at work on what he called ‘un joli Kammerabend’—a 
pretty chamber-evening—of violin pieces, including of course the Duo concertant, together with transcriptions of pieces from Petrushka (the ‘Danse russe’) and The Firebird (the ‘Berceuse’), and a completely new suite from Pulcinella which he christened Suite italienne. Later that summer they added further pieces from The Firebird and the early opera The Nightingale; and in the next year or two the little Pastorale (originally a vocalise composed in St Petersburg in 1907), and most notably the suite, or Divertimento as Stravinsky called it, from his recent Tchaikovsky-based ballet The Fairy’s Kiss. These various arrangements were pressed into service as they became available. The Duo concertant
 had its premiere in a Berlin radio concert in October 1932, and 
isolated recitals followed in 1933. In 1934 they undertook their first 
proper tour, in England as it happens, with concerts in Manchester, 
Liverpool (where Stravinsky found himself at a memorial lunch for Elgar 
the day after that master’s death), Cambridge, London and Oxford. Later 
that year there was a French tour, and in 1935 Dushkin accompanied 
Stravinsky on the composer’s second tour of the United States, playing 
recitals or the concerto (with orchestra) in cities as far-flung as 
Minneapolis, St Louis, San Francisco, Denver and Washington D.C., and 
baffling the frontiersmen with the discovery that the notorious composer
 of terrifyingly modern music which few of them had heard seemed on the 
whole to be a natural and rather gifted melodist. (Stephen Walsh)
 
 
 
 
 
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario