There is a paradox in music, and indeed all art - the fact that
life-enriching art has been produced, even inspired by conditions of
tragedy, brutality and oppression, a famous example being Messiaen's
Quartet for the End of Time, written while he was in a prisoner of war
camp. Gumboot Dancing bears this trait - it was born out of the brutal
labour conditions in South Africa under Apartheid, in which black
miners where chained together and wore Gumboots (wellington boots) while
they worked in the flooded gold mines, because it was cheaper for the
owners to supply the boots than to drain the floodwater from the mine.
Apparently slapping the boots and chains was used by the workers as a
form of communication which was otherwise banned in the mine, and this
later developed into a form of dance. If the examples of Gumboot Dancing
available online are anything to go by, it is characterised by a huge
vitality and zest for life. So this for me is a striking example of how
something beautiful and life-enhancing can come out of something far
more negative. Of course this paradox has a far simpler explanation -
the resilience of the human spirit.
My 'Gumboots' is in two parts
of roughly equal length, the first is tender and slow moving, at times
'yearning'; at times seemingly expressing a kind of tranquility and
inner peace. The second is a complete contrast, consisting of five,
ever-more-lively 'gumboot dances', often joyful and always vital.
However,
although there are some African music influences in the music, I don't
see the piece as being specifically 'about' the Gumboot dancers, if
anything it could be seen as an abstract celebration of the rejuvinating
power of dance, moving as it does from introspection through to
celebration. I would like to think however, that the emotional journey
of the piece, and specifically the complete contrast between the two
halves will force the listener to conjecture some kind of external
'meaning' to the music - the tenderness of the first half should
'haunt' us as we enjoy the bustle of the second; that bustle itself
should force us to question or revaluate the tranquility of the first
half. But to impose a meaning beyond that would be stepping on dangerous
ground - the fact is you will choose your own meaning, and hear your
own story, whether I want you to or not. (David Bruce)
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario