In a personal booklet note for this set Andris Nelsons celebrates the
recorded legacy of Brahms in Boston, referencing complete cycles from
Leinsdorf and Haitink and recordings of individual symphonies under
Koussevitzky, Munch and Ozawa. Only a conductor supremely confident in
his own identity would venture to do so, of course, and Nelsons is
nothing if not his own man in this repertoire, confounding expectations
in some respects while confirming them in others. His Brahms is as
vital, impulsive and rhythmic as all his work strives to be – though not
as sheerly dynamic as one might have imagined – but there is blend and
bloom, too, with Symphony Hall, Boston, seeming to accommodate this
music from the bass lines upwards; a deep and sonorous sound.
Nelsons talks of finding precisely the right character for each
movement and in that he truly listens to the music, feeling its pulse
and allowing the phrasing to evolve with as little intervention or
‘shaping’ as possible. He is generous without indulgence, muscular
without vulgarity. Just occasionally one senses him harnessing his
natural dynamism in deference to the music’s noble pedigree. Perhaps I
was expecting a higher degree of tension and excitement from the opening
movement of the First Symphony. The promise is there in the tragically
underpinned sostenuto of the opening – giving way as it does to the enticing woodwinds of the second lyric idea – but maybe the main Allegro could be a shade more imperative.
That’s the thing about this music: you don’t want to unduly drive it
but nor do you want to simply luxuriate in it. The second movement of
the First brings to the fore the distinguished Boston woodwinds and a
sense of the music evolving in the playing of it. And then there is the
finale, with storm clouds famously clearing with the BSO’s refulgent
solo horn and a chorale of trombones to die for. Now the main Allegro
here is liberating for sure, and perhaps Nelsons had been intentionally
holding something in reserve because the climax leading to the return
of the ubiquitous horn theme is rollicking indeed.
Anyone who thinks that Brahms was the conservative and Wagner
the radical needs to think again. The evolution of the Second
demonstrates how mindful Nelsons is of that. The myriad twists and turns
and underlying threat of the autumnal first movement (where the
deviation from and contortion of form is so pronounced) is boldly
chronicled, and the second movement – with wonderful string-playing – is
likewise gripping in the way Nelsons appreciates how daringly the
material is developed. But the sun comes out again in the bracing finale
and Nelsons is definitely off the leash. The return of the second
subject is the warmest of hugs and the coda is exuberantly rip-roaring,
descending trombones cutting through the texture like noisy bell chimes.
The Third Symphony is gorgeous. The first movement has what the Viennese might call Schwung
(Nelsons includes the exposition repeat) and the development really
earns its climax. In the slow movement the aforementioned naturalness
and fluidity of Nelsons’s phrasing (what musicality this man has) is
possessed of a spontaneity that repays his belief in the music. The
Bostonians really sing. And the celebrated Poco allegretto of the
third movement has the appropriate ache of nostalgia. Note, too, the
magical evaporation of the finale’s coda: Nelsons’s Wagner tellingly
referenced.
And so to the great Fourth. Again, don’t expect Toscanini. Nelsons
builds the first movement’s head of steam by stealth, measuring its
expansive lyricism – and grandeur – with a growing resolve. The measured
processional of the second movement evolves into something quite
ravishing, with the return of that second theme in the chest register of
the Boston strings especially memorable. A similar voluptuousness
arrives with the first variant of the chaconne finale and you can almost
feel Nelsons channelling Brahms in the way he moves from one inspired
improvisation to the next.
So, much to enjoy from an orchestra who seem to have found the
perfect soulmate for this stage in their ongoing journey. The mutual respect and like-mindedness is palpable in each of these performances
and, whatever you may feel about this choice or that, there’s always a
very real sense of music-making happening ‘in the moment’ and for that
one time only. (Edward Seckerson / Gramophone)
Link is down :(
ResponderEliminar